Education This is the place where we would discuss anything about education issues!!! 

Thread Tools 
Member

#11
01052008
Understanding can mean different things to different people.
1. understanding the problem 2. understanding how to apply the theorems to solve problems 3. understanding how to derive the formulae used Now, is having the no. 1 and 2 kind of understanding qualified enough to be considered as you have attained the goal of "understanding"? Let's face it, understanding to the level of no.3, that is to be able to derive and prove is not relevant to most people, even most engineers, scientists and mathematicians can't do that. If we see mathematics as a tool to solve problems, understanding to no.3 is simply useless, it may help you to gain a deeper gratification or intellectual joy; but it is still, utterly useless. Do you still use the method of exhaustion to find the area of a circle? You'd rather use πr?, would you not? As for teaching students how a formula comes about, I reckon most teachers do not have such mathematical aptitude to do so, granted that they might have the desire to do so. Mathematical proof is a very rigorous thing if it were to be taught in depth.
__________________
http://www.recom.org/forum/image.php...ine=1209939626 Ash nazg durbatul?k, ash nazg gimbatul, ash nazg thrakatul?k, agh burzumishi krimpatul. 
ReCom Addict
Administrator

#12
01052008
Quote:
I am in no way championing for everyone to be able to get the "level 3" understanding. And I did mention in the first post that people are born with different level and variety of talents and so it's ridiculous to ask for total, geniusmathematicianlevel of understanding in everyone. Maybe our little digression into the formulae of circle might have distorted what I originally meant in the first post. No, I don't think everyone should know master or memorise the methods of exhaustion in circular area. πr? does sound like a better idea to me. However, what I am championing, using your terms, is that we improve the "level 1", "level 2" and a "level 2.5" in all our students  which we are not doing well, in my opinion. Let's look at them one by one: level 1: understanding the problem For most people, it's easy for SPM level questions. All the problems are easily understandable. Level 2: understanding how to apply the theorems to solve (insyllabus / past year / routine) problems Everyone who has done enough practice are excellent in it. Level 2.5: being able to use the knowledge on nonroutine problems This is what I am trying to emphasize in this thread  being able to use your mathematical concept (I prefer this word to formula) in real world, where not all questions are routine questions. I have a feeling that many people are able to get a perfect score for whatever standard pastyearlike questions you throw to them; but when you give them a new take or a novel problem which requires no additional knowledge, they would stumble and not be able to tackle them. To do well in level 2.5, you need a REAL understanding instead of simply a familiarity with formula plugging. When you go to more advanced levels like engineering, programming, maths, science etc, formula plugging simply doesn't work well  you will struggle, unless your lecturer happens to be ones who are happy to repeat past year questions (which unfortunately happen quite frequently in melbourne uni engineering ). An example for what I mean: Quote:
(And I imagine that if one year SPM suddenly comes up with such a question, on the subsequent years all our SPM students will turn into clock problem experts, as pelangi will start including three hundred such questions ) Yes we can very well argue that a proportion of people simply do not have the intellectual capacity to solve such problems without practise, and that I empathise and understand. However, my main point all along has been that many people, including ones who actually have the intelligence, simply lose their capacity to solve a problem as such after acculturating themselves with the "practise is the only thing you need to do" mentality in our school. The capacity to solve such a problem is what you need in uni levels, and I sincerely believe that "just practise" mentality does explain why some undergraduates flounder in uni courses even though they did okay in SPM. Anyway, mathematicians do the "level 3" thing day in day out  they are not called mathematician for no reason.
__________________
[][][][flickr] Check out our ReCom wiki! Do contribute by writing or editing the existing articles so that everyone now and in the future can benefit from it! 

Slightly Senior Member

#13
01052008
I wonder why are there so few math enthusiast on recom??

ReCom Addict
Administrator

#14
01052008
There are actually quite a number, if you look at the number of participants in the "math / iq problems" thread.
Anyway, I found this good page describing the derivation of formulae for spheres, cones, pyramids etc. It doesn't contain greek alphabets at all so it's suitable for everyone  and here's to everyone who doesn't know how the formulae come about! It's very interesting. http://www.mathguide.com/lessons/Volume.html If only our teachers taught it when they gave us the formulae.
__________________
[][][][flickr] Check out our ReCom wiki! Do contribute by writing or editing the existing articles so that everyone now and in the future can benefit from it! Last edited by youngyew; 01052008 at 10:09 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost 
Less Junior Member

#15
02052008
because teachers themselves have never emphasized on understanding....
they only focus the steps, what i noticed... 
The Student
Administrator

#16
02052008
Quote:
The steps are there to show you how to move around, like how you would read the instructions manual after you've bought a new gadget. On how you understand it is another matter altogether, especially in a spoonfed society today...
__________________
"Never argue with an idiot (or a troll)… they’ll just drag you down to their level and beat you to a pulp with their experience." Internet 1:1 It is always good to be naive, for when we cease to be naive, it is the end of life as we know it! Check out our ReCom wiki! Do contribute by writing or editing the existing articles so that everyone now and in the future can benefit from it! 

ReCom Addict
Administrator

#17
02052008
Huh? Your teacher taught you how to derive a sphere's formula using pyramids? You must have had a great teacher.
__________________
[][][][flickr] Check out our ReCom wiki! Do contribute by writing or editing the existing articles so that everyone now and in the future can benefit from it! 
Slightly Senior Member

#18
03052008
I still remember my math teacher in form 2 asked the class to draw a circle, cut it into sectors of equal angles, and then paste it into sawtooth diagram as shown by bluez, to show how the formula for the area of a circle comes about. He also talked a lot about the good old days when he, as a student, had to write out every single reasoning in each step of his math homework.
__________________
知不知道饮酒和饮水有什么区别？酒越饮越暖，水越喝越寒。 你越想忘记一个人时，其实你越会记得他。人的烦恼就是记性太好，如果可以把所有事都忘掉，以后每一日都是个 新开始，你说多好 
ReCom Addict
Administrator

#19
03052008
Good math teacher. If I'm not mistaken, I think the sawtooth thing is actually in our maths textbook, and my teacher did mention it. But how about the pyramid for spherevolume thing? I have no memory of it whatsoever from secondary school.
__________________
[][][][flickr] Check out our ReCom wiki! Do contribute by writing or editing the existing articles so that everyone now and in the future can benefit from it! 
Super Junior Member

#20
14102009
Re: Mathematics: Is Understanding Underemphasized in Our Schools?
ahem excuse me?
its kumon that helped me understand the area of a pyramid/cone/sphere by means of integration apparently kumon worksheets have very simple ways for you to derive the formula of the area of regular polygons and their respective volumes as well. with calculus, of course 
Bookmarks 
Tags 
debate, education, malaysia, mathematics, pedagogy 
Thread Tools  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Further Mathematics T or etc  confusedfreaker  SPM & STPM  10  15062011 05:48 PM 
Mathematics Help  newell  Education  16  06022007 03:49 PM 
UK Schools  Laurence  Education  1  10102005 10:58 PM 
Real Events for Understanding the u/lying Mathem.mech.  etcmp  Education  2  21122004 12:54 AM 
{Jokes}  eh, good understanding, son?!  PeiWen  Jokes + Words of Wisdom + Interesting Articles  1  14032004 05:20 AM 